New US Analysis Shows The Vaccinated Now Make Up The Majority of COVID Deaths

A new analysis by the Kaiser Family Foundation has found that 58 percent of COVID-19 deaths in August 2022 in the United States occurred in people who had completed at least their primary series of vaccines.

This also compliments data from the previous month as well. In July, 59 percent of COVID deaths were among the vaccinated, and 39 percent were among people who had one booster or more. 

What's important to state about this new analysis, however, is that at least 80 percent of people in the US have had at least one dose, and approximately 70 percent of the population has had at least two doses. So it's natural that as the vaccine wears off, more "vaccinated" people will die as they make up most of the population.

According to the CDC's 'official' data, in August 2022 unvaccinated people died from COVID at six times the rate of those who got at least the primary series of the vaccine, despite the fact that more vaccinated people were dying.

According to Cynthia Cox, who conducted the analysis on behalf of The Washington Post, "We can no longer say this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated."

What was never acknowledged, however, is the fact that COVID-19 was never "a pandemic of the unvaccinated" as so many politicians claimed. It appeared to me at least, based on headlines and political rhetoric, that the unvaccinated people were being blamed for the spread of the virus, the emergence of variants and the for the continuation of the pandemic as a whole. But this simple was not true.

Throughout the pandemic, several countries and regions with the highest vaccination rates across the planet experienced the largest outbreaks. These instances were largely ignored and unacknowledged by legacy media and government health authorities.

In fact, we knew that the vaccine did not stop the transmission of the virus quite early on during their initial rollout. We knew that efficacy would only last a very short period of time as well. Furthermore, the vaccines weren't even tested for their ability to reduce transmission.

“Public and political discourse quickly normalized stigma against people who remain unvaccinated, often woven into the tone and framing of media articles...Political rhetoric has descended into moralizing, scapegoating, blaming and condescending language using pejorative terms and actively promoting stigma and discrimination as tools to increase vaccination.”

“The Unintended Consequences of COVID-19 Vaccine Policy: Why Mandates, Passports, and Segregated Lockdowns may cause more Harm than Good.” Several researchers from various academic institutions in the United Kingdom, United States and Canada .

To be clear, the reason why this story and analysis is important is that it reveals something that was known very early on but not acknowledged within public dialogue, that COVID vaccines did not last very long in reducing severe disease and death. This meant that consistent boosters would be a must. This is why emphasis on proper nutrition and healthy lifestyles is important, as well as other treatment protocols that are specific to this area.

This new analysis by The Washington Post is having health officials stress the importance of boosters. Despite high first and second dose vaccination rates in the US, only approximately 33% of citizens have received a booster dose. We've seen a similar trend around the world.

Outgoing White House Chief Medical Adviser, Anthony Fauci has emphasized the safety and efficacy of the approved vaccines in preventing severe illness and deaths, encouraging people to get vaccinated and boosted as soon as possible.

He said that coronavirus vaccine effectiveness wanes over time and the disease shouldn’t be compared to other vaccine-treatable illnesses because of new emerging variants.

“My message, and my final message, maybe the final message I give you from this podium, is that please, for your own safety, for that of your family, get your updated Covid-19 shot as soon as you’re eligible to protect yourself, your family and your community,” Fauci said.

Anthony Fauci

Again, we knew that whatever effectiveness the vaccine gave to people, especially to elder people where it can be argued there was protection from severe illness and death, that the protection waned quite rapidly over a period of a few months. This is why we see health authorities use this data to encourage 4th and 5th doses, and a continuation of COVID-19 shots in people, including children, every single year.

For children, there is no data showing the benefit of vaccination, and the risk of injury from COVID-19 vaccines may actually be greater than the risk of being hospitalized for COVID. Which brings me to my next point. What about the potential harms of these shots, why does mainstream media continue to stay completely silent about the concerning data we've seen? Like the fact that more doses of mRNA vaccines may adversely affect the immune system?

https://twitter.com/MartyMakary/status/1549726021636734976

Concerns of Repeated Vaccinations Raised

Earlier this year, the European drug regulator sent a dire warning to the world.  The agency was concerned that repeated boosters every four months could weaken a person’s immune response to the coronavirus. Marco Cavaleri, the agency’s head of vaccines strategy, said that regular boosters might be “overloading people’s immune systems and leading to fatigue.”

In a recent interview with German TV, senior editor at the British Medical Journal Dr. Peter Doshi expressed that that “Our legacy media has not done a good job in providing balanced coverage about the vaccines." He’s one of what seems to be thousands of scientists and doctors who have been raising a number of concerns regarding ignored important data on COVID-19 vaccines.

Doshi was part of an international group of eminent academics and physicians who went back and analyzed safety data from the original clinical trials that were the backbone of the FDA’s decision to authorize the mRNA vaccines in December 2020.  It was published in the peer-reviewed journal, Vaccine in September 2022.

The analysis showed that mRNA vaccines were associated with 1 additional serious adverse event for every 800 people vaccinated. This would normally have a vaccine taken off the market, and is in sharp contrast to the idea that serious adverse events are extremely rare as federal health regulatory agencies have commonly claimed with regards to COVID-19 vaccines. 

Beyond their analysis, it’s important to mention that vaccine injury surveillance and reporting systems around the world have recorded a record number (millions) of serious injuries (hospitalizations, deaths, permanent disabilities) that people believe to be a result of COVID-19 vaccines. Multiple papers have emerged explaining the possible mechanisms of action as to why these are occurring. Many of these injuries and safety signals don’t seem to be properly investigated, and again, a proper discussion about this topic has not been had. Even the concept and discussion around natural immunity has been completely thrown out the window throughout the pandemic.

Federal health authorities have still not investigated the fact Pfizer falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial for COVID vaccines. Big Tech even censored the British Medical Journal for making this story public.

Could these injuries and information, which the mainstream and government often frames as "false" or "misleading" be the reason why we've seen such a drastic drop in people getting their booster shots? Or perhaps it's because some vaccine mandates have eased off and many people who did not want the shots were forced and coerced initially?

This seems to be unacceptable to the 'powers that be.' Vaccines have been tied to a global digital vaccine identification passport system that is still in the works, and seems to be the backbone of more digital developments well into the future, like Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), for example.

COVID Narrative Issues

All that said, throughout the pandemic it's been quite clear that around the world that we've been bombarded with a misleading COVID-19 death count. Flaws in the way COVID fatalities were calculated was an obvious problem throughout the pandemic, and there are numerous examples.

Even today, we don't know how many COVID-19 deaths were actually a result of COVID-19, and the same most likely applies to both vaccinated and unvaccinated deaths at this time. Multiple health authorities openly admitted that even if a person in the hospital died of a completely separate cause yet tested "positive," COVID-19 was listed as a cause of death.

PCR testing concerns were also an issue that were ignored by legacy media. The probability of "false positives" was very significant, and mass testing of every single person in the hospital is something that has never happened in the history of viruses. What would RSV and flu numbers look like if we tested every single person that entered a hospital, or a workplace? What would their death count really be if we included these viruses on the death certificates of every single person who died with a "positive" test in the hospital like we did for COVID-19?

So, when the World Health Organization reports that 629 million cases and 6.5 million deaths have been linked to the pandemic, it's easy to assume that these numbers are likely misleading.

Again, a proper conversation around these facts has not been had.