Chris Cuomo Admits He's Taking Ivermectin, Criticizes CNN For Smearing Joe Rogan

Plus the conversation about COVID vaccine injuries continues to grow in the mainstream.

Set Your Pulse: Take a breath. Turn your attention to your body and release any tension. Breathe slowly into the area of your heart for 60 seconds, focusing on feeling a sense of ease. Stay connected to your body as you read. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

---

There’s something interesting taking place right now with the COVID vaccine injury discussion in the mainstream sphere: they are being acknowledged much more, although still downplayed.

In my last piece, I referred to an article Dr. Setty wrote covering how the New York Times began discussing the idea that ‘thousands’ of people believe they have been COVID vaccine injured.

Although the NYT downplayed things, they began having the conversation which is important. And it may be a sign that the mainstream is beginning to test the waters to see how much permission space there is to talk about the obvious.

Next, Chris Cuomo, former CNN anchor and now with NewsNation, was interviewed on the Valuetainment podcast and spoke about his use of Ivermectin and how it was wrong that Ivermectin was shunned during COVID.

In the interview clip, Cuomo is playing himself as the hero for now speaking ‘the truth’ about Ivermectin, all while trying as hard as he can to avoid admitting he flat out got several things wrong.

1. He called Florida Rep Byron Donalds dumb for being hesitant about the COVID vaccine, claiming his taking it would protect other people too. Donalds knew this wasn’t true but somehow Cuomo did not. Even though it was obvious at THAT time that COVID vaccines didn’t stop transmission. Cuomo, at the time, didn’t do his research or was flat out told to protect consensus reality.
   

2. Then Cuomo begins talking about how he is taking Ivermectin and that it’s safe. In fact, all the doctors he talks to tell him that. Cuomo claims that back when CNN was running fake news stories about Ivermectin they were simply given “bad information” and that if they knew Ivermectin was good and safe, they might have reported it fairly. Fat chance.
   
   Any moderately reasonable journalist would have done their job and dug deeper into the Ivermectin story before running with the nonsensical idea that it was “horse dewormer” and ”unsafe for human consumption”.
   
   During all of this, Cuomo painstakingly avoids saying “Joe Rogan was right all along.” You recall the famous CNN hit piece where they color-edited footage to make Rogan (who was taking Ivermectin at the time) look sick all while saying he was dumb for taking “a horse dewormer” even though everyone knew Ivermectin was safe for human consumption. My coverage of that story was censored and deleted from The Pulse YouTube channel at the time. But I did reference it further here.
   

3. Cuomo begins talking about vaccine adverse events and claims he has long COVID but not ‘long vaccine’… which is to say a vaccine induced adverse event. How could Cuomo know this? He cannot. He believes there are adverse events affecting thousands (now becoming a keyword), and blames the government for not being honest and forthcoming about the subject and not investigating it further. He also seems to think all of this is new, and that there haven’t been many highly credible people and outlets discussing these things for years. Including an entire subcommittee investigating COVID origins.

When Cuomo was on CNN spewing mistruths, mainstream media was at the behest of their Big Pharma sponsors during a time of ‘crisis.’ They didn’t want to fairly critique the product their funders were attempting to force upon the world, and it wasn’t fashionable to go against what the government was saying.

This is the trouble with media that is deeply funded by governments or large corporations - there is a conflict of interest when it comes to fair reporting.

Further, as I mentioned in my previous piece, there was very little permission space within our culture to do any real journalism, including calling out COVID vaccines or even talking reasonably about Ivermectin. If you did, you were a conspiracy theorist.

So as expected, those in mainstream media who knew something was wrong (not Cuomo) kept their mouth shut. This is an important point as you’ll see later. Recall in my previous piece that an exec at CBC News stated that during COVID “no real journalism was being done at CBC” and they knew that.

A day later Chris Cuomo brought Dr. Deborah Birx, who served as the White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator, on his show to discuss many things COVID, including the need for transparency on COVID origins and vaccine injuries.

Cuomo sets up one question by pointing to the paranoia people have about COVID vaccines and eventually asks about safety and efficacy.

Birx responded by defending the efficacy for what it was “studied and designed for” which she states was to reduce severe disease. Even though the government messaging was that it would stop transmission. Further, the vaccines seemed to only perhaps be effective for a matter of a few weeks. Birx goes on to say:

“Well, that's why we need all the people to come forward that have had reactions. Because I'm not sure all of them have been reported. Do I think it's millions? No. Could it be thousands? Yes. But there's millions of people with long Covid. So proportionately when you look at it in honest, data-driven way more people have long Covid from having Covid than had vaccine reactions. That doesn't mean we shouldn't study it.”

I agree that not all are reported. She seems to be placating lightly to this fact that many have been bringing up for ages while smeared for doing so. I agree that likely millions have long COVID. I myself still don’t have 100% of my sense of smell back 3 years after my COVID infection. I’m not vaccinated.

In my research, it appears the spike protein from COVID, the portion of the virus they used in COVID injections to produce an immune response, was likely toxic and causing issues whether through infection or injection. There are also some mechanisms in place to suggest the vaccine induced spike may actually cause more problems given the vaccine didn’t stay at the injection site.

So why would we assume that if millions have long COVID it wouldn’t be millions with vaccine related injuries? This is foolish.

Also, just as we saw in the New York Times story, there is this idea of “thousands” being injured. But how many thousands? Tens? Hundreds? How do we know it’s not millions? I suspect Birx knows the number is high, but even if she did, could she say what she actually thinks? No. Because permission space to honestly and transparently discuss this is still growing. As it does, we’ll see a shift.

Although it can feel tad frustrating to watch a 3 year late to the game mainstream media begin talking about this issue more honestly, I do see steam building within what I feel might be about 30% of mainstream journalists who have likely known all along that something was wrong but knew they couldn’t even go down that path.

The time for them to get to speak is building. I discussed this more here. But, those journalists will be in an internal narrative war with those trying hard to admit they got things wrong and who want to maintain control of the narrative.

No Egg On Their Face

What’s happening now is the same thing we saw with UFOs and the US government’s decades-long withholding of truth on the subject. They are now trying to control the UFO narrative as they slowly and carefully come clean about SOME of it. So long as they do it in a way where they are/were not wrong and they get to say they made the right choices all along. Basically, they don’t want to get egg on their face as they change ‘the truth.’

This will involve never admitting the alternative perspective was right all along. Never apologizing for their lies and deceit, and always twisting what happens now to favor their own narrative on a subject that has grown too large to ignore - hence permission space.

Cuomo just gave us a masterclass on how 70% of the mainstream will take this. While I hope we will see the other 30% begin saying what they knew all along. Trust me, they are out there, and I believe this is how we will see some change from within. This is important as many aren’t suddenly going to start believing alternative media, truths need to come from within consensus reality too. As I’ve said, permission space for this to happen is growing.

The power structure trying to control the narrative won’t be able to hold onto it forever. Just like there came a point when the Catholic Church could not longer threaten and bully people into staying quiet about their rampant protection of pedophiles, the truth about COVID vaccines and ivermectin coverup shall emerge too as the number of people talking about it increases.

A Chance For Wisdom

Wisdom will be seen when those of us who were saying all along “Something is wrong with this product, let’s investigate, we’re being lied to” can accept that this was the path we collectively needed. Accepting the now for what it is and holding space to continue truth building without having to gloat in the face of those opening up.

Yes, feel the emotion of frustration and anger for a moment if it arises, let it move through your body, but then choose the wise path and don’t shit on those waking up. It does no good but feed our ego.

This is how we can turn a moment of authoritarianism and division into one of unity and love.

We may not have a choice about how societal elitists play their games, but we have a choice in how we navigate our way toward expanded consciousness.

And for all of us as a reminder, one of the most important lessons for many as our collective delusions continue to break: do not lose a sense of curiosity in favor of picking a hard and fast side. People out there will tell you that you must, but this is foolish. You’re likely to end up in bias and unnecessary suffering as many out there become your enemy.