Manadavilli was one of the worst offenders. She should get a pass because she now gets 'permission' to write about it. The damage they've done is incalculable and likely irreversible at this point. And it's especially bad in Canada.
I am not interested in ‘permission space’, to me it’s condescending and insulting. Moreover, as I’ve left the mass media sphere a long time ago, I’ve discovered that there are excellent sources to get decent, honest information. The NYT has proven too many times that they are not to be trusted, I believe they’ve lost their credibility a ling time ago. Why would anyone still want to hope for the NYT’s ‘permission space’?
Pharma controlling Media via Ad space and Government Agencies via the revolving door and intensive lobbying has got to be curtailed. It shouldn't cost so much to tell the truth, to do the 'right' thing?
Interesting take, Joe. Is the Times testing the water or just covering their ass. We shall see. I for one do not trust this major propaganda arm of the octopus. Linking today @https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/
We know from the Denmark study that 4.22% of the shots caused about 70% of SAE. 32% were placebos. Without knowing the batches given to the Swedes we can't make sense of the number of excess deaths.
This is a different and uplifting take. I find so much of media these days feels exhausting, but not this. Thank you for something more evolutionary. 🙏
It's a very fair breakdown of the situation you have offered. The underreporting in Canada seems worse than here in the US where about 250 million people were vaxxed, resulting in about a million reported adverse events so far. In Canada, if we assume about 30 million were vaxxed, there should have been at least 100,000 incidents of adverse events.
Manadavilli was one of the worst offenders. She should get a pass because she now gets 'permission' to write about it. The damage they've done is incalculable and likely irreversible at this point. And it's especially bad in Canada.
I am not interested in ‘permission space’, to me it’s condescending and insulting. Moreover, as I’ve left the mass media sphere a long time ago, I’ve discovered that there are excellent sources to get decent, honest information. The NYT has proven too many times that they are not to be trusted, I believe they’ve lost their credibility a ling time ago. Why would anyone still want to hope for the NYT’s ‘permission space’?
Put the apologists in jail for a year to think about what they did.
Pharma controlling Media via Ad space and Government Agencies via the revolving door and intensive lobbying has got to be curtailed. It shouldn't cost so much to tell the truth, to do the 'right' thing?
Interesting take, Joe. Is the Times testing the water or just covering their ass. We shall see. I for one do not trust this major propaganda arm of the octopus. Linking today @https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/
We know from the Denmark study that 4.22% of the shots caused about 70% of SAE. 32% were placebos. Without knowing the batches given to the Swedes we can't make sense of the number of excess deaths.
This is a different and uplifting take. I find so much of media these days feels exhausting, but not this. Thank you for something more evolutionary. 🙏
It's a very fair breakdown of the situation you have offered. The underreporting in Canada seems worse than here in the US where about 250 million people were vaxxed, resulting in about a million reported adverse events so far. In Canada, if we assume about 30 million were vaxxed, there should have been at least 100,000 incidents of adverse events.