The COVID vaccine conversation is an important one, but rife with hyperbole. On one hand, it appears regulators and pharma companies are claiming their product is safe and effective, while companies mandate the jab on millions.

Yet this is a new drug that has not been well tested, especially not in the long term. There are adverse events occurring and for the most part they are being unacknowledged.

On the other hand are claims that these products will wreak mass destruction, yet there is very little evidence to support these predictions. So how do we go about making sense what what we do KNOW?

This presentation offers an idea and acts as a tool to bridge gaps in this controversial conversation.

Part 2

Sustain our work well into the future by becoming a member of our Explorer Lounge: https://join.explorerlounge.one/

Inside our Explorer Lounge membership, you get access to exclusive video content as well as a private social network filled with like-minds, just like you, who are working to make sense of the world, explore alternative solutions and who support each other in times of need.

References

NYT: CDC is not publishing large portions of data it collects.

Associated Press

Pfizer trial in NEJM

Brook Jackson in BMJ

EUA Memorandum (Adult Trial)

EUA Memorandum (Pediatric Trial)

Anaphylaxis after Covid Vaccine

Six months of VAERS reports (Lancet)

CDC ACIP on Risk of Myocarditis

Pfizer Six month Results