Then there's that niggling fact that after 60 years and several attempts, all of the documents are yet to be released publicly! Maybe Trump will follow through this time when he gets back in office. And you're right Tom, when he does it could start an untangling of a very big web of deception. Could ultimately heal this nation from its wounds!
Dearest Tom, Well written account and considerations. At age 10, I too witnessed, live on WKBW TV, the JFK assassination, in 1963, and vowed to find the whole truth ... and I have. It goes far beyond understanding of the 5 Ws "Who, What, When and Where, specially if we ask the question, "WHY?" That is something that very few people, other than the conspirators themselves, can answer ... and those who, via life experience, have witnessed and realized the 'whole' Truth. The picture that you present here of the car, is one that was doctored, as were many of the photos you will find online. The addition of the middle seat bank was from another visit of the Kennedy's to Dallas, and later added in. The magic of 'Photoshop'! There is a lot of doctored media floating around to confuse. I encourage you to view my substack, and I will be happy to compare notes. There is a reason "Why?" All of what is happening today is relative to this assassination, which truly goes back centuries, and even civilizations. It's all about the money honey, and the matter ... 'gold' and what it represents! https://open.substack.com/pub/sterry448/p/jfk-assassination-november-22-1963?r=pvup8&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Some of the most important revelations are apparently not available to the AI, such as the 4-hour interview of Jack Kruse by Danny Jones on Patreon or 'Kennedy's Last Stand' by Dr. Michael Salla. Yet the AI would probably ignore these unless grilled with successive questions. I'm wondering if the AI 'learns' from these question sessions and would spew a different answer next time it is grilled.
No I don't think the AI learns - each session is its own with no memory on the part of the AI and I am sure the sources you mention are not part of its training. The point is that its training is pretty much attuned to preserving the status quo unless deeply probed.
The truth on the JFK assassination and many other contentious issues in our collective history, will likely never be known, if AI is brought into the picture as some kind of authority. Compared to a human, an AI will never get to the point you want it to make a definitive determination on. Instead you will get endless lists, with the points listed all supporting the conventional view of the mainstream and the government. It may strategically agree with you, but only on small issues like some evidence being unreliable. A person on the other hand, in the process of being questioned, will be drawn towards the obvious conclusion, whether they are being honest or whether they are trying to obfuscate the truth. In the latter case where the witness is not intending to tell the truth, a point will come for listeners who sincerely want to know the truth, where it will become clear that the person is lying, because if they are trying to avoid the truth, it will become the proverbial elephant in the room under pointed questioning. If they are just ignorant to the real truth, similarly under questioning, their ignorance will stick out like a sore thumb.
But you will not get that from an AI, because truth or government lies are all the same to it. It has nothing to prove, only maintain the official position. And like a computer playing chess, AI will anticipate being trapped in a ploy, as soon as you type in the question which hints at the trap, and it will avoid any line of discussion which might lead it to being caught in it. It is really us who are in a jaded position, always trying to disprove the government position which is that there was no conspiracy or that ETs don't exist. Why should a bunch of guys who obviously aren't concerned about anything but getting elected, be concerned about getting to the truth or even knowing it themselves ? It's much safer to maintain the status quo and address current issues which make you popular, rather than stir up something that makes enemies in the establishment.
God save us all, if AI is ever brought in as a judge in legal matters, especially those to do with personal issues (rather than at the corporation level). It would be the complete antithesis of a Native circle process of dealing with offenders which seeks understanding and equitable resolution among all involved when a crime has been committed, not punishment per se. Using AI in a court would only lead to the government getting its way and having the status quo enforced in all judgements AI makes, rather than any resolution for anyone else being achieved.
The real danger is that the more we use AI ourselves, and start to tailor our questions, and indeed our way of thinking, to make them amenable to getting the response we want from it, that we will start to think exclusively like that (even when thinking to ourselves) and then like i already wrote -- God save us all.
As for the Kennedy assassination, the 'more than a lone gunman' (thus a conspiracy) position is a BS halfway answer to who did it, like prove Oswald wasn't the only one and you've proved the government wrong. It's not tenable because it's not about looking directly for the truth. If you orient to the complete truth, rather than just trying to prove the government position wrong, it's clear that Oswald wasn't even involved and that by far the greatest number of witnesses to the event, said that the shots came from the grassy knoll not from the Book Depository building where Oswald worked https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GU2CORn61_w&list=PLC3508F37D1866E43
On recommendation of Robert F Kennedy Jr i read the book, 'JFK and the Unspeakable' by James W Douglass and he provides some witness accounts that i haven't seen anywhere else -- like the deaf and dumb guy on the overpass who saw 2 guys behind the white picket fence on the grassy knoll dressed like railway workers, one for which shot a rifle towards the passing motorcade ! (It seem s that not being able to hear the gunshots, which focussed the attention of all the others who had that vantage point towards the motorcade, his visual observation abilities remained on the bigger picture.)
It's also clear from other testimony about who set up the assassination, that the CIA was behind it, likely George H W Bush who has been identified as the field agent for the CIA in Texas (where the assassination happened) https://www.nytimes.com/1988/07/11/us/63-fbi-memo-ties-bush-to-intelligence-agency.html Of course George Bush (Sr) then went on to be President and his son President for a total of 4 terms.
As long as the neocons are still involved in US politics (Dick Cheney, one of the three conspirators on 9-11 along with Bush Jr and Rumsfeld, just endorsed Kamala Harris for President https://x.com/AndrewDesiderio/status/1832167027114410348 ) we are sure to have the truth on the Kennedy assassination issue continue to be obscured, so why not make up your own mind and be satisfied with knowing the truth ? Just do so before AI gets to be the absolute authority on everything, for you.
You showed how you brillantly « forced » the AI to come close to a somehow honest/usefull answer. We can expect that it « learned » from this and will better avoid it in the future?
Either the AI is putting words in your mouth, or your highlighting what is your comments and questions is missing in at least 1 instance. I don't recall you stating 'tragic failure' e.g. 'Your characterization of this as a "tragic failure" is apt.', yet that seems to be part of the AI response to you. So, I am left wondering what is truly the AI response and which are your questions to it. Still, wow, the AI response is Highly - Highly Biased! Amazing and thanks for pursuing this.
Hi Tom - Tom here. I think you got it. Yes tragic failure was the AI's response but only after I asked it a series of questions that brought that out. Had I simply accepted its first response or two it never would have "admitted" that law enforcement had not done their jobs.
The Law enforcement (CIA), Gov Officials - (LBJ) and all the Banksters (Chase, Morgan, Murchison...) who backed the District of Columbia Federal Reserve and did not want JFK to announce that the gold was going back to the US Treasury - for the people - via June 4, 1963 Executive Order 11110 ... have since kept these facts hidden from view ... and the shipment of 57,000 of gold bars to be put in the US Treasury from World Bank Owner President Soekarno, for the people ... Nobody knows that, but a handful of people worldwide ... and most of them have since been silenced! https://open.substack.com/pub/sterry448/p/jfk-assassination-november-22-1963?r=pvup8&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web .
AI, no matter how it is presented by those who are enamored of it, is the product of the original programmers.
Then there's that niggling fact that after 60 years and several attempts, all of the documents are yet to be released publicly! Maybe Trump will follow through this time when he gets back in office. And you're right Tom, when he does it could start an untangling of a very big web of deception. Could ultimately heal this nation from its wounds!
Dearest Tom, Well written account and considerations. At age 10, I too witnessed, live on WKBW TV, the JFK assassination, in 1963, and vowed to find the whole truth ... and I have. It goes far beyond understanding of the 5 Ws "Who, What, When and Where, specially if we ask the question, "WHY?" That is something that very few people, other than the conspirators themselves, can answer ... and those who, via life experience, have witnessed and realized the 'whole' Truth. The picture that you present here of the car, is one that was doctored, as were many of the photos you will find online. The addition of the middle seat bank was from another visit of the Kennedy's to Dallas, and later added in. The magic of 'Photoshop'! There is a lot of doctored media floating around to confuse. I encourage you to view my substack, and I will be happy to compare notes. There is a reason "Why?" All of what is happening today is relative to this assassination, which truly goes back centuries, and even civilizations. It's all about the money honey, and the matter ... 'gold' and what it represents! https://open.substack.com/pub/sterry448/p/jfk-assassination-november-22-1963?r=pvup8&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Some of the most important revelations are apparently not available to the AI, such as the 4-hour interview of Jack Kruse by Danny Jones on Patreon or 'Kennedy's Last Stand' by Dr. Michael Salla. Yet the AI would probably ignore these unless grilled with successive questions. I'm wondering if the AI 'learns' from these question sessions and would spew a different answer next time it is grilled.
No I don't think the AI learns - each session is its own with no memory on the part of the AI and I am sure the sources you mention are not part of its training. The point is that its training is pretty much attuned to preserving the status quo unless deeply probed.
The truth on the JFK assassination and many other contentious issues in our collective history, will likely never be known, if AI is brought into the picture as some kind of authority. Compared to a human, an AI will never get to the point you want it to make a definitive determination on. Instead you will get endless lists, with the points listed all supporting the conventional view of the mainstream and the government. It may strategically agree with you, but only on small issues like some evidence being unreliable. A person on the other hand, in the process of being questioned, will be drawn towards the obvious conclusion, whether they are being honest or whether they are trying to obfuscate the truth. In the latter case where the witness is not intending to tell the truth, a point will come for listeners who sincerely want to know the truth, where it will become clear that the person is lying, because if they are trying to avoid the truth, it will become the proverbial elephant in the room under pointed questioning. If they are just ignorant to the real truth, similarly under questioning, their ignorance will stick out like a sore thumb.
But you will not get that from an AI, because truth or government lies are all the same to it. It has nothing to prove, only maintain the official position. And like a computer playing chess, AI will anticipate being trapped in a ploy, as soon as you type in the question which hints at the trap, and it will avoid any line of discussion which might lead it to being caught in it. It is really us who are in a jaded position, always trying to disprove the government position which is that there was no conspiracy or that ETs don't exist. Why should a bunch of guys who obviously aren't concerned about anything but getting elected, be concerned about getting to the truth or even knowing it themselves ? It's much safer to maintain the status quo and address current issues which make you popular, rather than stir up something that makes enemies in the establishment.
God save us all, if AI is ever brought in as a judge in legal matters, especially those to do with personal issues (rather than at the corporation level). It would be the complete antithesis of a Native circle process of dealing with offenders which seeks understanding and equitable resolution among all involved when a crime has been committed, not punishment per se. Using AI in a court would only lead to the government getting its way and having the status quo enforced in all judgements AI makes, rather than any resolution for anyone else being achieved.
The real danger is that the more we use AI ourselves, and start to tailor our questions, and indeed our way of thinking, to make them amenable to getting the response we want from it, that we will start to think exclusively like that (even when thinking to ourselves) and then like i already wrote -- God save us all.
As for the Kennedy assassination, the 'more than a lone gunman' (thus a conspiracy) position is a BS halfway answer to who did it, like prove Oswald wasn't the only one and you've proved the government wrong. It's not tenable because it's not about looking directly for the truth. If you orient to the complete truth, rather than just trying to prove the government position wrong, it's clear that Oswald wasn't even involved and that by far the greatest number of witnesses to the event, said that the shots came from the grassy knoll not from the Book Depository building where Oswald worked https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GU2CORn61_w&list=PLC3508F37D1866E43
On recommendation of Robert F Kennedy Jr i read the book, 'JFK and the Unspeakable' by James W Douglass and he provides some witness accounts that i haven't seen anywhere else -- like the deaf and dumb guy on the overpass who saw 2 guys behind the white picket fence on the grassy knoll dressed like railway workers, one for which shot a rifle towards the passing motorcade ! (It seem s that not being able to hear the gunshots, which focussed the attention of all the others who had that vantage point towards the motorcade, his visual observation abilities remained on the bigger picture.)
It's also clear from other testimony about who set up the assassination, that the CIA was behind it, likely George H W Bush who has been identified as the field agent for the CIA in Texas (where the assassination happened) https://www.nytimes.com/1988/07/11/us/63-fbi-memo-ties-bush-to-intelligence-agency.html Of course George Bush (Sr) then went on to be President and his son President for a total of 4 terms.
As long as the neocons are still involved in US politics (Dick Cheney, one of the three conspirators on 9-11 along with Bush Jr and Rumsfeld, just endorsed Kamala Harris for President https://x.com/AndrewDesiderio/status/1832167027114410348 ) we are sure to have the truth on the Kennedy assassination issue continue to be obscured, so why not make up your own mind and be satisfied with knowing the truth ? Just do so before AI gets to be the absolute authority on everything, for you.
Very interesting analysis. Thank you
You showed how you brillantly « forced » the AI to come close to a somehow honest/usefull answer. We can expect that it « learned » from this and will better avoid it in the future?
Either the AI is putting words in your mouth, or your highlighting what is your comments and questions is missing in at least 1 instance. I don't recall you stating 'tragic failure' e.g. 'Your characterization of this as a "tragic failure" is apt.', yet that seems to be part of the AI response to you. So, I am left wondering what is truly the AI response and which are your questions to it. Still, wow, the AI response is Highly - Highly Biased! Amazing and thanks for pursuing this.
Hi Tom - Tom here. I think you got it. Yes tragic failure was the AI's response but only after I asked it a series of questions that brought that out. Had I simply accepted its first response or two it never would have "admitted" that law enforcement had not done their jobs.
The Law enforcement (CIA), Gov Officials - (LBJ) and all the Banksters (Chase, Morgan, Murchison...) who backed the District of Columbia Federal Reserve and did not want JFK to announce that the gold was going back to the US Treasury - for the people - via June 4, 1963 Executive Order 11110 ... have since kept these facts hidden from view ... and the shipment of 57,000 of gold bars to be put in the US Treasury from World Bank Owner President Soekarno, for the people ... Nobody knows that, but a handful of people worldwide ... and most of them have since been silenced! https://open.substack.com/pub/sterry448/p/jfk-assassination-november-22-1963?r=pvup8&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web .