The evidence around what happened on 9/11 suggests that either we are being lied to when it comes to the official story or 9/11 contained events creating the greatest coincidence of all time.
There is a third possibility that HAS been researched by Dr. Judy Wood. Dr. Wood holds a BS in Civil Engineering, an MS in Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics) and a PhD in Materials Engineering Science). In her book, "Where Did the Towers Go" she painstakingly lays out through a forensic scientific investigation of what did and did not happen in NYC on 9/11. The government's official story NOR the controlled demolition version of events can explain all of the events of that day. Dr. Wood allows the facts of her investigation to lead her way to a very different conclusion: a Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) was used to break the molecular bonds of the building materials, creating a near total collapse, without the expected debris field, because the materials were turned into dust. Along with her book, Dr. Wood has laid out this comprehensive study on YouTube and on Rumble. One video inter splices bits of the movie "The Matrix" and uses an "over the top" soundtrack. Look past that glaring commercial feeling impression and stay for the facts. I have studied the events of 9/11 for 22 years and was convinced of the demolition theory but now I believe that story is an "opposition containment " ploy to keep us always looking in the wrong direction. Of course reaching a comprehensive understanding of 9/11 was motivation but also the knowledge of DEWs and their potential use for the good of humanity is a driving premise for the work of Dr. Wood.
Spend a few minutes more; check out her videos on the internet. The Red pill awaits.
WOW !!! Sounds like you might be like the typical LIB / Democrat ? maybe who gets ( got ) their info only from the government sponsored PRAVDA type sites the CIA is behind. You are years late in questioning the "story" they spun about 9/11.
Catherine Austin Fitts of SOLARI.com speaks to the fact it was likely part of a cover up regarding the missing $$$TRILLIONS Rumsfeld talked about that could not be accounted for ( at least not after any evidence of where it went got destroyed that day. )
Yes. I was years late. But what exactly is "late"? 16 years? 1 month?
I am very familiar with ae911truth. Richard Gage is my friend and he was generous enough to advise me in crafting this long essay. As was Tony Szamboti, another powerful voice of dissent.
There is a third possibility that HAS been researched by Dr. Judy Wood. Dr. Wood holds a BS in Civil Engineering, an MS in Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics) and a PhD in Materials Engineering Science). In her book, "Where Did the Towers Go" she painstakingly lays out through a forensic scientific investigation of what did and did not happen in NYC on 9/11. The government's official story NOR the controlled demolition version of events can explain all of the events of that day. Dr. Wood allows the facts of her investigation to lead her way to a very different conclusion: a Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) was used to break the molecular bonds of the building materials, creating a near total collapse, without the expected debris field, because the materials were turned into dust. Along with her book, Dr. Wood has laid out this comprehensive study on YouTube and on Rumble. One video inter splices bits of the movie "The Matrix" and uses an "over the top" soundtrack. Look past that glaring commercial feeling impression and stay for the facts. I have studied the events of 9/11 for 22 years and was convinced of the demolition theory but now I believe that story is an "opposition containment " ploy to keep us always looking in the wrong direction. Of course reaching a comprehensive understanding of 9/11 was motivation but also the knowledge of DEWs and their potential use for the good of humanity is a driving premise for the work of Dr. Wood.
Spend a few minutes more; check out her videos on the internet. The Red pill awaits.
WOW !!! Sounds like you might be like the typical LIB / Democrat ? maybe who gets ( got ) their info only from the government sponsored PRAVDA type sites the CIA is behind. You are years late in questioning the "story" they spun about 9/11.
Lots of good info at the website Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth : https://www.ae911truth.org/
Catherine Austin Fitts of SOLARI.com speaks to the fact it was likely part of a cover up regarding the missing $$$TRILLIONS Rumsfeld talked about that could not be accounted for ( at least not after any evidence of where it went got destroyed that day. )
Yes. I was years late. But what exactly is "late"? 16 years? 1 month?
I am very familiar with ae911truth. Richard Gage is my friend and he was generous enough to advise me in crafting this long essay. As was Tony Szamboti, another powerful voice of dissent.