Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andylit's avatar

Shame on you. The primary accuser is so completely over the top and clearly insane that we now understand the reluctance of rational people to release "everything". This guy accuses multiple PRESIDENTS of abusing him or being present. Bush AND Obama? Really?

The LEO's interviewing him correctly labeled him as...ahem...less than credible.

WhateverLolawantsLolagets's avatar

One problem....Clinton did not know Epstein at that time, nor did he hang with Bush. Because of the attacks on Clinton this has been scrutinized. Bill Barr & Bush Sr. were involved with the CIA & all that stuff but this is just smashed together. It's not good enough. It can't be accepted because it doesn't fill gaps. They're stupidly adding Clinton's name based on assumptions that's how I know it's crap. Come back when you can prove it. Bush was involved in Franklin sex scandal & that was all republicans, no Dems. The breaking of people was done in the CIA programs. Stop dragging the Clintons into crap they have no involvement in. Hillary? Please....just stop. What sloppy research is this?

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?