Strange unknown objects along with the appearance of beings have been well documented for hundreds and thousands of years. This article presents a few examples.
i didn't know that the "Project Bluebeamers" have become such a big 'voting block' on the ET/UFO issue. At the beginning of your article, Arjun, you are trying to be very inclusive of all the possibilities out there, but i think you are missing some. For one, if Bluebeamers have so suddenly appeared as a big 'voting block', it's likely this perception itself is being actively pushed as fact by those who control memes on social media. And isn't it relevant that they recently made it a 'phenomena' rather than an 'object' (UAP vs. UFO) -- a necessary prerequisite for Bluebeam to be able to create an illusion (phenomenon) of a UFO, rather than the previous incontrovertibly solid object not from this planet ?
Of course after this new development on 'the real truth behind UAP' was conjured on social media, real people would then become inspired to jump on the Bluebeam -- nothing is real -- bandwagon. But under your insightful premise -- that whenever something becomes big on social media regarding the UFO/UAP issue, it can be assumed to be sign of a deliberate deception brewing to keep hidden something that if it was known to be true by many people, it would spoil their plans. And so, exactly what is this idea of Bluebeam creating UFOs, keeping hidden ? Hold on to that question.
You are suggesting, Arjun, that UFO must be real and not conjured out of the blue by those in high places, since classic unidentified aerial phenomena have been reported throughout history -- therefore before the technology was obviously available to conjure them artificially.
But tie this thought with the one i asked you to hold on to -- what is the idea of Bluebeam creating UFOs, keeping hidden ? The only thing they could be obfuscating is that the Bluebeam illusion machine is not run by people in high places at all but actually by other 'agencies', appearing from the heavenly realms (since that is what pre-modern people thought was "up there") ? Under this assumption, it becomes possible to question all strange aerial phenomena, even those going back to antiquity since it's obvious non-terrestrial agencies could have developed advanced illusion creating technologies way before humans historically did so. So with this logic -- that a Bluebeam type mechanism could be responsible for conjuring all aerial phenomena from the beginning of time, we have now eliminated all possibility of there being any real ETs operating UFOs, right -- but we still need to leave the actual agency responsible for creating illusions of ETs in UFOs, unresolved then. Maybe it was indeed something supernatural ? But wouldn't the illusion then have had to be just as supernatural as the ones who created the illusion-making mechanism, since humans couldn't have ?
And there we have it -- the classic paradox that's inherent to all good conceptual con jobs put on by the CIA et al -- that every UFO/UAP since the advent of humankind could be a conjured illusion but to have this be true -- what was being conjured was in fact what was responsible for the conjuring itself. Too complex a notion to even be considered a viable possibility ? Exactly its purpose ! -- to, as a result of the logical dead-end, spin out the diametric polarity we have at present -- UFOs are all an illusion per Bluebeam vs. UFOs are solid as historical fact.
So is there any evidence non-terrestrial agencies have been conjuring themselves since before the advent of human technological capability to do same ? -- Consider Fatima back in 1917. Although already previously connected by some researchers with the UFO phenomena, native Portuguese researchers, Joaquim Fernandes and Fina D'Armada did a massive amount of original research on the nature of the Fatima event over the course of 3 decades, writing 3 books on their findings. With their academic and political influence they were able to get access to the original Vatican records and they interviewed all available witnesses still alive in the 1970s, who had personally witnessed the "Miracle of the Sun" (as the event was dubbed by the Vatican).
The Vatican's version of Fatima portrayed a very similar testament across all witnesses of the "miracle" as well as the visions of all the seers -- all along religious lines. In contrast, the Portuguese researchers found a vast degree of difference among the reports of a more extensive set of witnesses. Many people in the crowd on Oct. 13th 1917 said they saw a disk obscure the sun and start spinning, not that the sun itself did that, while others reported they saw nothing unusual happen in the sky at all. Within the consensus however, they drew many parallels to cases of previous and subsequent, accepted UFO encounters, concluding that the event was "Simply Ufological. Simply explainable in light of the observations of our day!" Heavenly Lights: The Apparitions of Fatima and the UFO Phenomenon p. 145.
So they unequivocally felt UFOs were behind the Fatima event, but they also emphasized how what people perceived that day, "may have been projected images, somehow impressed on the minds of those present, evoking religious personages fixed in their belief systems." Ibid p. 199. The Vatican, of course would have selected out only those testimonials which adhered to a visitation by the Holy Mother of Christ and a wild movement of the actual sun meant as a warning against going astray from Catholic dogma.
Maybe many UFO events are projections of a kind, rather than visitations by objectively solid beings and craft. There are some reports of beings telling their witnesses of them -- we can't be perceived by you in your present state of development, so we are projecting to your mind a likeness of us you can relate to. But this fact would not deem a massive cover-up of the truth through an orchestrated social media scheme of "Bluebeam is behind it all." The only remaining truth they could be hiding then, would be -- there are some ETs in UFOs like the ones behind Fatima -- who are in the act of deceiving us through a Bluebeam type illusion creation means and they don't want us to know this and since they already have influence over many aspects of our society they can try to pull the wool over our eyes. But luckily at present we are still free to make up our own minds on what is really going on.
Einstein proved mathematically that all time occurs at the same time. Its form is a flat disc, a round sphere, or a saddle shape. I think some of these sightings are time periods coming very close to one another. And some of these sightings may be time travelers…us, possibly using AI to go back in time to retrieve something mankind desperately needs.
i didn't know that the "Project Bluebeamers" have become such a big 'voting block' on the ET/UFO issue. At the beginning of your article, Arjun, you are trying to be very inclusive of all the possibilities out there, but i think you are missing some. For one, if Bluebeamers have so suddenly appeared as a big 'voting block', it's likely this perception itself is being actively pushed as fact by those who control memes on social media. And isn't it relevant that they recently made it a 'phenomena' rather than an 'object' (UAP vs. UFO) -- a necessary prerequisite for Bluebeam to be able to create an illusion (phenomenon) of a UFO, rather than the previous incontrovertibly solid object not from this planet ?
Of course after this new development on 'the real truth behind UAP' was conjured on social media, real people would then become inspired to jump on the Bluebeam -- nothing is real -- bandwagon. But under your insightful premise -- that whenever something becomes big on social media regarding the UFO/UAP issue, it can be assumed to be sign of a deliberate deception brewing to keep hidden something that if it was known to be true by many people, it would spoil their plans. And so, exactly what is this idea of Bluebeam creating UFOs, keeping hidden ? Hold on to that question.
You are suggesting, Arjun, that UFO must be real and not conjured out of the blue by those in high places, since classic unidentified aerial phenomena have been reported throughout history -- therefore before the technology was obviously available to conjure them artificially.
But tie this thought with the one i asked you to hold on to -- what is the idea of Bluebeam creating UFOs, keeping hidden ? The only thing they could be obfuscating is that the Bluebeam illusion machine is not run by people in high places at all but actually by other 'agencies', appearing from the heavenly realms (since that is what pre-modern people thought was "up there") ? Under this assumption, it becomes possible to question all strange aerial phenomena, even those going back to antiquity since it's obvious non-terrestrial agencies could have developed advanced illusion creating technologies way before humans historically did so. So with this logic -- that a Bluebeam type mechanism could be responsible for conjuring all aerial phenomena from the beginning of time, we have now eliminated all possibility of there being any real ETs operating UFOs, right -- but we still need to leave the actual agency responsible for creating illusions of ETs in UFOs, unresolved then. Maybe it was indeed something supernatural ? But wouldn't the illusion then have had to be just as supernatural as the ones who created the illusion-making mechanism, since humans couldn't have ?
And there we have it -- the classic paradox that's inherent to all good conceptual con jobs put on by the CIA et al -- that every UFO/UAP since the advent of humankind could be a conjured illusion but to have this be true -- what was being conjured was in fact what was responsible for the conjuring itself. Too complex a notion to even be considered a viable possibility ? Exactly its purpose ! -- to, as a result of the logical dead-end, spin out the diametric polarity we have at present -- UFOs are all an illusion per Bluebeam vs. UFOs are solid as historical fact.
So is there any evidence non-terrestrial agencies have been conjuring themselves since before the advent of human technological capability to do same ? -- Consider Fatima back in 1917. Although already previously connected by some researchers with the UFO phenomena, native Portuguese researchers, Joaquim Fernandes and Fina D'Armada did a massive amount of original research on the nature of the Fatima event over the course of 3 decades, writing 3 books on their findings. With their academic and political influence they were able to get access to the original Vatican records and they interviewed all available witnesses still alive in the 1970s, who had personally witnessed the "Miracle of the Sun" (as the event was dubbed by the Vatican).
The Vatican's version of Fatima portrayed a very similar testament across all witnesses of the "miracle" as well as the visions of all the seers -- all along religious lines. In contrast, the Portuguese researchers found a vast degree of difference among the reports of a more extensive set of witnesses. Many people in the crowd on Oct. 13th 1917 said they saw a disk obscure the sun and start spinning, not that the sun itself did that, while others reported they saw nothing unusual happen in the sky at all. Within the consensus however, they drew many parallels to cases of previous and subsequent, accepted UFO encounters, concluding that the event was "Simply Ufological. Simply explainable in light of the observations of our day!" Heavenly Lights: The Apparitions of Fatima and the UFO Phenomenon p. 145.
So they unequivocally felt UFOs were behind the Fatima event, but they also emphasized how what people perceived that day, "may have been projected images, somehow impressed on the minds of those present, evoking religious personages fixed in their belief systems." Ibid p. 199. The Vatican, of course would have selected out only those testimonials which adhered to a visitation by the Holy Mother of Christ and a wild movement of the actual sun meant as a warning against going astray from Catholic dogma.
Maybe many UFO events are projections of a kind, rather than visitations by objectively solid beings and craft. There are some reports of beings telling their witnesses of them -- we can't be perceived by you in your present state of development, so we are projecting to your mind a likeness of us you can relate to. But this fact would not deem a massive cover-up of the truth through an orchestrated social media scheme of "Bluebeam is behind it all." The only remaining truth they could be hiding then, would be -- there are some ETs in UFOs like the ones behind Fatima -- who are in the act of deceiving us through a Bluebeam type illusion creation means and they don't want us to know this and since they already have influence over many aspects of our society they can try to pull the wool over our eyes. But luckily at present we are still free to make up our own minds on what is really going on.
Einstein proved mathematically that all time occurs at the same time. Its form is a flat disc, a round sphere, or a saddle shape. I think some of these sightings are time periods coming very close to one another. And some of these sightings may be time travelers…us, possibly using AI to go back in time to retrieve something mankind desperately needs.
Wow you should be on Ancient Aliens!
Couldn't stop ready this 🙏