Epstein Accuser Implicates "George Bush 1" & Others With Rape & Ritual Abuse of Babies In New Epstein File
Sexual & ritualistic abuse involving the worlds most powerful people has been a common theme from accusers for multiple decades. Here we take a look at another example from the recent Epstein files.
The newly released trove of documents pertaining to Jeffrey Epstein by the U.S. Department of Justice outlines some horrific details. As if child sex trafficking wasn’t already horrific enough, one document outlines an email in 2019 detailing an interview with a supposed Epstein victim.
Below is a screenshot of the email. You can access the document here.
Many names are redacted in these files, but in this particular document, we can see the sender, which seems unusual. The email was sent from Walter Harkins, an NYPD detective with the FBI-NYPD Child Exploitation and Human Trafficking Task Force. Harkins retired last year, following a 33-year career with the department.

As you can see from the first screenshot, the supposed victim outlines horrific details about ritualistic sacrifices and dismemberment he witnessed as a child. He also claims he was raped by “George W. Bush 1”.
Furthermore, he claimed he was raped by President Clinton as well as Jeffrey Epstein, and that Donald Trump and then girlfriend Melania were also on the Yacht, as you can see from the screenshot below.
Below is the first page of the email. These are indeed accusations, and it’s clear that the NYPD and FBI had no interest in investigating the matter, given the fact that there was no evidence that came forth from the interview.
I believe it would have been proper to at least interview the mother of the accuser. He was living with him at the time of this interview, and she would be able to confirm the claim about his relatives being members at the yacht club where he met Epstein, as well as the abuse he suffered from them (his great uncle).
The fact that this accuser could be fabricating this story should not detract from other cases and claims with more substance.
George H.W. Bush, former head of the CIA and President of the United States, has been implicated by multiple people and youths with regard to the sexual abuse of children. For example, Dr Steve Pieczenik, a former Department of State official who held many roles within US politics, including serving as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under Henry Kissinger, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Regan, and George H.W. Bush, stated the following in 2019,
“It has been rampant in our government, if you remember Bush Sr. had a whole group of young Hispanic men who he groomed and played with. At the same time, Hillary and Bill Clinton along with their friend Mr. Epstein went down to the Bahamas and they were molesting and utilizing young girls and boys to have sexual pleasures, but nothing was done about the fact that Jeffrey Epstein had been guilty and convicted of that crime.”
Multiple youth victims in the “Franklin Scandal” also named him as an abuser.
“Research eventually led to the Franklin scandal that broke in 1989 when hundreds of children were apparently flown around the US to be abused by high ranking ‘Establishment’ members. A 15 year old girl disclosed that she had been abused since the age of 9 and was exposed to ‘ritual murder’ of a new born girl, a small boy (who was subsequently fried and eaten) and three others.”
- European Psychiatry Volume 33, Supplement, March 2016, Page S580
There were several children implicated in the Franklin Scandal, and if you want to learn more about it and take a deep dive there, I suggest reading the work of Nick Bryant.
“Nick Bryant’s seven year investigation of the Franklin sage is unsurpassed. What makes Nick’s account so powerful is that he amassed so many witnesses and so much documentary evidence as to establish his case beyond reasonable doubt.”
- Professor Warwick Middleton MB BS, FRANZCP, MD, who at the time of writing this forward (written in the book) in 2012 was the Director of the Trauma and Disassociation unit at Belmont Hospital in Brisbaine, Australia.
Prior to the revelations of Jeffrey Epstein, those who created awareness using scholarly and educated sources regarding child sex trafficking and the powerful people involved were deemed “conspiracy theorists.” Things have changed, obviously, but the human mind can only stretch so far. We at Collective Evolution & The Pulse created awareness about these issues more than a decade ago. In doing so, our research uncovered disturbing facts, and it’s unsettling that “official government release” is the basis for truth and credibility. Who knows what remains concealed from the public, and what has actually been confirmed behind the closed doors of the government?
Having spent a great deal of my time/career investigating and uncovering such issues, I can tell you that we do not need to wait for the government in order to see things clearly. In fact, this can be counterproductive and still paints these organisations as ‘ministries of truth.’
The topic discussed in this article has been “in our face” for decades; there are multiple examples.
For example, a 2022 Balenciaga ad showed unsettling pictures of a child holding teddy bears dressed in bondage outfits. In the ad, lying on a table were legal documents from a US Supreme Court decision on child porn laws, “hidden in plain sight.”
I go more in-depth in the article below if you’re interested. The main message here is that our world is drenched in secrecy in multiple areas, from medicine to entertainment to finance and more. Transparency and coming to grips with certain aspects of our reality and healing is a key factor for our civilization to move forward and create better systems that can serve the human race.






Power, corrupt and absolute power, corrupt absolutely
If none of these accusations have been tested in a court of law with corroborating evidence they are no more than hearsay and slander. A hundred accusers with no evidence to support the accusations does not make their claim true because of the numbers. There is plenty of evidence that can be supported with evidence but many of these are completely untested claims and should therefore not been made public because they undermine the case that should have been brought against Epstein.