Sexual & ritualistic abuse involving the worlds most powerful people has been a common theme from accusers for multiple decades. Here we take a look at another example from the recent Epstein files.
"Recovered memories" from someone who is clearly very disturbed (and I mean that last in a sympathetic way). I am very, very, very skeptical. It seems someone abused this individual, but who and to what degree...? It's likely never to be determined in this case. plainsenseandsanity.substack.com
Phew. As a child SA survivor, hard to read and a necessary article nonetheless. Thank you. What we’re talking about is called transgression.
It’s when rich and powerful men (and some women) deliberately, often systematically, cross moral, legal, or social boundaries, fueled by a sense of entitlement, immunity, and power. It is characterized by the belief that one is above the rules, using wealth and influence to disregard ethical standards, exploit the vulnerable, and escape consequences.
If none of these accusations have been tested in a court of law with corroborating evidence they are no more than hearsay and slander. A hundred accusers with no evidence to support the accusations does not make their claim true because of the numbers. There is plenty of evidence that can be supported with evidence but many of these are completely untested claims and should therefore not been made public because they undermine the case that should have been brought against Epstein.
There is truth in what you say. But when you look at something like the Franklin Scandal and study it in depth, that's a good example of knowing something is up...Also corroborating accusations and supposed experiences are interesting to at least look at. But you are right, it's hard to get to the bottom of things with no real evidence, which is quite common in child sex trafficking cases that implicate the elite unfortunately.
"Recovered memories" from someone who is clearly very disturbed (and I mean that last in a sympathetic way). I am very, very, very skeptical. It seems someone abused this individual, but who and to what degree...? It's likely never to be determined in this case. plainsenseandsanity.substack.com
The laundry list is absolutely absurd. So obviously fabricated that it should never have seen the light of day.
Posting it casts doubt on legitimate claims by actual victims.
Phew. As a child SA survivor, hard to read and a necessary article nonetheless. Thank you. What we’re talking about is called transgression.
It’s when rich and powerful men (and some women) deliberately, often systematically, cross moral, legal, or social boundaries, fueled by a sense of entitlement, immunity, and power. It is characterized by the belief that one is above the rules, using wealth and influence to disregard ethical standards, exploit the vulnerable, and escape consequences.
If none of these accusations have been tested in a court of law with corroborating evidence they are no more than hearsay and slander. A hundred accusers with no evidence to support the accusations does not make their claim true because of the numbers. There is plenty of evidence that can be supported with evidence but many of these are completely untested claims and should therefore not been made public because they undermine the case that should have been brought against Epstein.
There is truth in what you say. But when you look at something like the Franklin Scandal and study it in depth, that's a good example of knowing something is up...Also corroborating accusations and supposed experiences are interesting to at least look at. But you are right, it's hard to get to the bottom of things with no real evidence, which is quite common in child sex trafficking cases that implicate the elite unfortunately.
Power, corrupt and absolute power, corrupt absolutely