Healthy 14 Year Old Girl Dies 2 Days After COVID Booster With "Vaccine-Related Multiple-Organ Inflammation"
A 14 year old healthy athletic Japanese girl died unexpectedly 2 days after receiving a third dose of the Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.
Set Your Pulse: Take a breath. Release the tension in your body. Place attention on your physical heart. Breathe slowly into the area for 60 seconds, focusing on feeling a sense of ease. Click here to learn why we suggest this.
A recent paper published in Legal Medicine covers the case of a 14-year-old Japanese girl who died unexpectedly 2 days after receiving a third dose (booster) of the Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.
She tested negative for COVID and other viruses during the autopsy.
The authors explain,
“Autopsy findings showed congestive edema of the lungs, T-cell lymphocytic and macrophage infiltration in the lungs, pericardium, and myocardium of the left atria and left ventricle, liver, kidneys, stomach, duodenum, bladder, and diaphragm. Since there was no preceding infection, allergy, or drug toxicity exposure, the patient was diagnosed with post-vaccination pneumonia, myopericarditis, hepatitis, nephritis, gastroenteritis, cystitis, and myositis. Although neither type of inflammation is fatal by itself, arrhythmia is reported to be the most common cause of death in patients with atrial myopericarditis. In the present case, arrhythmia of atrial origin was assumed as the cause of cardiac failure and death. In sudden post-vaccination deaths, aggressive autopsy systemic search and histological examination involving extensive sectioning of the heart, including the atrium, are indispensable.”
In the paper the authors point out that serious adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination “have been a problem.” In the case of this 14-year-old girl, multiple-organ inflammation, or myopericarditis which led to severe arrhythmias and progressive heart failure, was determined to be the cause of her death.
The day after vaccination the girl developed a fever of 37.9 ◦C, which resolved by the same evening. Her sister, who had slept with her that night, reported that she woke up briefly because she was having difficulty breathing. She talked with her sister and went to bed soon after.
The authors explain:
“The following morning, her mother noticed that she was not breathing and had a pale appearance, and she immediately called an ambulance. The patient was in cardiopulmonary arrest when the ambulance crew arrived at their house and attempts to administer advanced life support were unsuccessful. She died 45 h after the third vaccination. After the first dose of vaccine on 12th September 2021, she had arm pain without fever. The day after the second dose on 3rd October 2021, she missed school because she had a fever of less than 38 ◦C. All three vaccines were made by Pfizer. An autopsy was performed the following day to evaluate the cause of sudden death.”
Høeg makes an excellent point in her Tweet above. We must ask if COVID vaccinations are causing net harm in certain age groups. The blanket statement of ‘everyone needs to be vaccinated’ seems highly irresponsible.
The authors of this paper also outline their belief that COVID-19 vaccinations were important elements to control the pandemic. But many experts around the world have been criticized and censored for sharing the opposite opinion.
In fact, many experts in the field were confused as to why children were encouraged to get vaccinated for COVID in the first place. There is data from all over the world that shows COVID vaccines may be much more dangerous for children than COVID itself. Serious injuries were also seen in children during clinical trials.
During the height of the pandemic multiple countries recorded zero COVID deaths in young people, and information is now emerging showing how some countries, like the US, exaggerated the severity of the pandemic.
Some CDC, FDA & NIH Scientists expressed that they were even embarrassed by the lack of science guiding COVID vaccine policy.
There are plenty of examples of renowned experts in the field, like senior editors and professors at major medical journals and COVID vaccine developers, publishing data and sharing information showing cause for concern.
Concerning science and mechanisms of action that may account for some of these injuries has also been published.
Prior to this I wrote about a paper published in Clinical Cardiology on November 27, 2022, that describes the autopsy findings from people who died within days of their COVID-19 vaccination. It was concluded that five out of twenty-five people that were the subject of those autopsies died as a result of their shot(s).
Prior to that I came across a paper by three pathologists who published a piece in the journal, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine regarding their examination of autopsies conducted of two teenage boys who died days after receiving Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. The three pathologists, two of whom are medical examiners, concluded the vaccine was responsible.
Autopsy reports can even be found in vaccine injury reporting systems. For example, a 15-year-old boy who died six days after receiving his first dose (Pfizer), VAERS report (I.D. 1764974), showed that the boy died of myocardial inflammation.
The point is that there are many examples when it comes to young kids, and given the lack of danger they face with COVID, why are they being told to be vaccinated?
Furthermore, vaccine injury reporting systems around the world have received a record number of serious injury reports. The majority of vaccine injuries reported since the inception of these reporting systems decades ago are due to COVID-19 vaccinations. That said, the popularity of these reporting systems has grown immensely during COVID, so that has to be factored in as well.
I’ve come across multiple social media pages, like Jab Injuries Australia, that are dedicated to sharing the stories of people who believe they were injured from their COVID inoculations.
At the end of the day we were oversold on the safety and effectiveness of these vaccines. Doctors and scientists around the world who raised questions were censored and told they were ‘anti-vaccine’ without addressing the warning signals they raised, many of which are now proven to be true.
The safety signals from these vaccines suggest these are some of the most dangerous vaccines we have ever seen to date, and as time goes on that suspicion many had and reported on is being confirmed by more data.
Where there is risk there must be a choice, and therefore mandating these vaccines is/was highly problematic. This is one of the primary issues around why so many people are/were upset.
Despite legitimate information, opinion, evidence and science, rather than encouraging open debate, governments and government health authorities have simply silenced any form of criticism. In doing this they protect the unethical activities of the pharmaceutical industry from scrutiny.
These days, people are so attached and blinded by their political affiliation that, when something calls into question what their “side” believes, they have a hard time even entertaining it. People seem to be more concerned with being right instead of being passionate about truth and transparency.
It would be great to see health authorities and those who label others as “anti-vaccine” actually become aware of the information and evidence that has so many people concerned, and address them appropriately.
Instead, all we’ve seen is political rhetoric turn into demoralizing and condescending language that actively promotes stigma and discrimination.
The good news is that COVID served as a massive catalyst for many people to see things about our world and our ‘leadership’ that weren’t clear to them before. When information like this is shared and supported, especially in the age of censorship, it creates a ripple effect of critical thinking and questioning that is needed now more than ever on our planet.
While I can’t say that I’m surprised by this news, I’m deeply saddened at the level of ignorance our society has fallen to. So many still believe that the death of a child like this is offset by the benefits of these inoculations - sheer madness
Government edicts do not belong in personal health choices. Whether you believe in the efficacy of any treatment the final decision ultimately lies with the individual. Nobody owns anybody else's body and thus they have no right to dictate what you choose to put in your body. In all cases informed consent must be the rule. Governments and private companies mandating any treatment and using threats such as loss of livelihood are an affront to human dignity.