10 Comments
User's avatar
Shelley Chadwick's avatar

While he's at it he should build homes and give free healthcare to all the military veterans that have been pushed to the outskirts of society and forgotten about.

Surely he could squeeze enough money out of the billion dollar "defense" budget to treat PTSD victims and prevent a suicide epidemic?

Expand full comment
Stacey SC's avatar

They want "freedom of choice" portrayed for political purposes only. When that same "freedom of choice" is denied women, they call it "God's will". The current administration holds no honor.

Expand full comment
Digger B!'s avatar

If Dr David Martin is correct, then the MRNA programmed people's bodies to manufacture spike proteins which were patented by Pfizer in 1990. There has been plenty of opportunity to study the effect of these proteins on the human body. It should of course be patently obvious that flooding the cardiovascular system with up to 30,000,000,000,000 Velcro like spike proteins is not going to end well...

Just the other day I learned that the official USA Spend website shows that on 11/12/2019, the US taxpayer was giving money to Ukrainian Bio labs to carry out "COVID 19 RESEARCH". The trouble is that this was a month before the "surprise" pandemic started, and 3 months before it was named COVID 19!

https://expose-news.com/2023/08/06/cia

-deagel-2025-depopulation-on-target/

Expand full comment
Glen Andersen's avatar

Once again, Thankyou for an informative read , with balanced considerations AKA turning down the heat on inflammatory arguments from either “side” of an issue

Expand full comment
Arjun Walia's avatar

Thanks Glen!

Expand full comment
Marion's avatar

Thanks for the article, though I question this statement: "Sure, if solid science at the time showed that these shots would stop transmission and be completely safe and effective, then yes, it could be justified." The problem lies in the phrase "solid science," since, as we have seen, data and studies can be manipulated (and have been) to support baseless lies. And NO medical intervention could ever be proven "completely safe and effective"; even the best ones will have some side effects, however mild, and the truth is that most cause at least a small degree of serious adverse events. Moreover, you would never be able to know anything conclusively about safety or efficacy until many years had passed, whereas the coercion happens in the short term. It's simply wrong to force any human to undergo any medical intervention they do not feel willing to take, for whatever reason. Sovereignty over our own bodies must be respected, period.

Expand full comment
TomNearBoston's avatar

Bingo! This "mandate if the science is solid" lline of argument shows how poorly we understand the most fundamental underpinnings of our nation -- the reason those guys picked up those muskets. The individual has the right to life and liberty. Everyone has the right to refuse the diktat of some special whitecoated priest class. "Emergency" or no "emergency."

In coming times we will hear this "mistakes were made, but..." stuff from the govt/corporate/medical powers a lot. We need to attack it lustily every single time.

Expand full comment
Arjun Walia's avatar

Well said!

Expand full comment
Altered States of America's avatar

what's so nice about that? much better for people to stay out of the military. enough of this bullshit that us military is somehow a good thing. look at what they're doing around the globe. run by psychopaths who lust for blood, as if they are defending a noble cause, like the Nazis felt.

Expand full comment
Arjun Walia's avatar

Those who have followed our work know very well how we feel about the global military industrial complex. I decided to leave this out of the article given that I was trying to make a point about vaccine mandates.

Expand full comment