Renowned Scientists Ask FDA To Change COVID Vaccine Labels To State They Don't Prevent Transmission/Death - FDA Responds

The FDA has responded to a request by a number of prominent academics to amend COVID-19 vaccine labels.

Set Your Pulse: Take a breath. Release the tension in your body. Place attention on your physical heart. Breathe slowly into the area for 60 seconds, focusing on feeling a sense of ease. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

---

Since March 2020 an unprecedented amount of authoritarianism started to spread like wildfire. Because of COVID-19, emergency laws began to proliferate as citizens sacrificed their rights and freedoms for the sake of others, or at least they thought they did.

Populations were told that lockdowns, vaccine and mask mandates were for the good of the collective. Politicians slammed people with the rhetoric that they were “following the science.”

But the truth is science was hijacked, and it’s encouraging to see all of the world-renowned scientists, experts and doctors in the field who are continuing the fight to hold federal health regulatory agencies accountable.

Given the amount of power these organizations have amassed, it seems like an impossible task.

On January 31st, world-renowned scientists requested that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) amend COVID-19 vaccine labels to state that they don't prevent transmission or death, among other requests. The list of scientists involved in this request can be seen below.

They emphasized to the FDA that COVID-19 vaccine labels were incomplete, inaccurate and misleading and requested the following from the FDA.

Firstly, they asked to “add language clarifying that phase III trials were not designed to determine and failed to provide substantial evidence of vaccine efficacy against SARVS-CoV-2 transmission or death.”

Secondly, to “add language clarifying that the immunobridging surrogate endpoint used in multiple authorized indications has not been validated to predict clinical efficacy.”

Requests 3 to 8 you can see below.

The letter also goes into great detail regarding each point. You can access it here.

On April 18th, the FDA finally responded. They stated that, with regard to the transmission aspect,

“It is important to note that FDA’s authorization and licensure standards for vaccines do not require demonstration of the prevention of infection or transmission. A vaccine can meet the licensure standard if the vaccine’s benefits of protecting against disease outweigh the vaccine’s risks for the licensed use. There is no requirement that the vaccine also prevents infection with the pathogen that can cause the disease or transmission of that pathogen to others. Similarly, a vaccine can meet the EUA standard without any evidence that the vaccine prevents infection or transmission. To that end, there is no requirement that the clinical trials supporting a vaccine’s licensure or authorization be designed to determine whether the vaccine prevents infection of a pathogen or transmission of that pathogen to others.”

The FDA stated the following,

You can access their full response and explanation for the other points here if interested.

They Don’t Prevent Transmission? Nothing New

Despite the fact that government health agencies bombarded us with the idea that the mass COVID-19 vaccination campaign and mandates were to prevent the spread, it was always known that the vaccine was never originally tested for its transmission-stopping capability.

So why were we constantly told it would stop the spread with clever slogans like “two weeks to stop the spread?” Other lines were "end the pandemic" and "get back to normal." Why were the unvaccinated singled out and held responsible for prolonging the pandemic? Why did the unvaccinated lose their jobs and ability to move around freely? What science was there to justify this? Why were so many experts in the field vilified?

There were multiple cases of exponential outbreaks throughout the pandemic in the most highly vaccinated populations. The territory or nation of Gibraltar was one of the first to vaccinate 100 percent of its eligible citizens, yet they experienced an exponential rise in COVID cases during this time.

Other examples of transmission among the vaccinated are quite robust. Early on we found out that vaccinated people were responsible for spreading COVID just as the unvaccinated were. 

In Massachusetts for example, a total of 469 new COVID cases appeared during a number of public events in July of 2021, and 74 percent of these cases occurred in those who were fully or partially vaccinated.

In Israel, an outbreak of COVID-19 involving 16 healthcare workers, 23 exposed patients and two family members was caused by a fully vaccinated patient. Of all exposed individuals, the vaccination rate was 96.2 percent.

Two unvaccinated patients developed mild disease, while fourteen fully vaccinated patients became severely ill or died.

In fact, of the top five counties that had the highest percentage of the population fully vaccinated (99.9–84.3%), the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identified four of them as “high” transmission counties during the height of the pandemic.

Along with the waning efficacy of COVID vaccines, early on there were multiple studies showing both the vaccinated and unvaccinated could carry the same viral load.

According to a study published in October 2021, infected vaccinated and unvaccinated people can also carry the same viral load. Viral load is a good proxy for infectiousness.

Another study was conducted with positive samples from asymptomatic testing at UC Davis for Healthy Yolo Together and at the Unidos en Salud walk-up testing site in the Mission District of San Francisco.

A press release from UC Davis Explains,

“When they analyzed the data, the researchers found wide variations in viral load within both vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, but not between them. There was no significant difference in viral load between vaccinated and unvaccinated, or between asymptomatic and symptomatic groups.”

The only argument that can be made saying otherwise would be the idea that efficacy in preventing symptomatic infection for a short period of time may have been solid based on clinical trial data. But these sentiments come from clinical trial participants that not only had survivable infection but fully recovered without needing hospitalization.

There was never any science available to trust that justified mass vaccination campaigns and coercing people, especially young people, to get vaccinated. So why were we told there was? Why do believe that there was? Why weren’t we given an accurate representation of data along with the freedom of choice to be vaccinated?

Academics from the University of California, San Francisco have published a new paper titled “Statistical and Numerical Errors Made by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) During the COVID-19 Pandemic.”

The paper outlines 25 instances when the CDC reported statistical or numerical errors. Twenty (80%) of these instances, according to the researchers, “exaggerated the severity of the COVID-19 situation.”

They also explain how the CDC was notified about the errors in 16 (64%) instances and later corrected the errors, at least partially, in 13 (52%) instances.

As the paper points out, it’s quite ironic that “inaccurate and misleading information” labels were put on various scientific papers, posts made by experts in the field, and more throughout the pandemic yet the CDC themselves have been outed multiple times for spreading misinformation.

It’s still hard to believe what happened during the pandemic and it really makes you ponder just what else the masses can be made to believe so easily without critical thinking or questioning. This is the power of fear and propaganda.