18 Comments

What we have learned recently they knew thousands of years ago. Most was destroyed much as our history now is being either perverted or destroyed.

Expand full comment

Very Good Tom. I was looking over comments. Whoa. This isn't going to be the cakewalk that was on the advertisement when I signed up for this mission. I'll keep the scanners on captain. I'm certain I saw signs of intelligent life down there. Have you scoped out The Briefings from Allies of Humanity? I pound it daily to get that perspective into the quagmire for people to consider. In the final analysis, it boils down to what rings true with the inner truth meter (Knowledge, Spirit of Truth and such) and what makes sense. Unfortunately The Briefings from The Allies make too much sense. I've been on this stuff for over 50 years and so mark my words. This is not a situation where you would want to be able to later tell someone, "I told you so". It's about planets and needy beings that are not human. Thanks for the great article and opportunity to share here with you'all PULSE folks. I appreciate you very much and stand with you in an invisible war for truth and goodness.

Onward to the winning.

Expand full comment

Oh, and GIORDANO BRUNO was burned at the stake because he was a Luciferian and was influenced by the hermetic tradition recently translated in Florence (and sparked the renaissance).

Expand full comment

If you haven’t discovered that “space” is 1000% fake (CGI) just like the “Hubble deep space”(deep fake) photos, you are still hopelessly enslaved. Science is the newest religion masquerading as vigorous and evidence based endeavor. Some of it is evidence based as long as it doesn’t interfere with hermetic dogma. Heliocentrism is the truth (geocentrism) inverted and hermetic, gnostic and Kabbalist Luciferian religion disguised as “science”. Astronomy is actually astrology disguised as science. Luciferians are sun worshippers and that’s why the sun is the center of their “solar system”. Lack of curvature is easily demonstrable by how far we can see with our own eyes AND binoculars.

Expand full comment

All knees shall bend before our Lord Jesus Christ in all the universe. Amen.

Expand full comment

Would that also include alien knees on other planets?

Expand full comment

This essay reads the same as the conversation I had with my dad and second oldest brother yesterday, as we watched college football together. I’ll be sure we keep a beer cold for you in the mini-fridge from now on.

Expand full comment

Two excellent game. I was right there with you although I wrote this last week.

Expand full comment

Over the years I have often wondered what secrets are hidden in the vaults of the Vatican. Even more of a mystery is how much of our history was burned or otherwise destroyed to maintain their power. The things is you can only maintain a lie for so long. Sooner or later the truth will be exposed.

Expand full comment

Maybe let's hope. I think what was lost in the Library of Alexandria and the Mayan scrolls burned (and also stolen) by the Church

Expand full comment

The heliocentric model is a scientific impossibility, I have asked countless ball believers and not one can refute these four facts that completely follow scientific laws and historica evidence.

Fact 1: gas always expands to fill the volume

Fact 2: the only way to keep gas from expanding to fill the volume is to keep it in a physical air tight container. (No one buys propane in a bucket.)

Fact 3: no one in history has ever shown gravity preventing gas from expanding to fill the volume.

Fact 4: when these facts are presented, most thinking people can connect the dots and realize that if the ball model is surrounded by an infinite volume of super low pressure and no physical container and the FACT that no one in history has ever demonstrated a single condition where gravity formed an airtight container, those thinking people would realize that it is SCIENTIFICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for the ball to have air.

Remember that Boyle's law observes that gas always expands to fill the volume of a container unless the container it IS SO LARGE THAT A DENSITY GRADIENT BECOMES SIGNIFICANT. Which is why we actually have a graduated atmosphere instead of having an equalized exceptionally low pressure that matches fake space specs of only 2 hydrogen atoms per cubic meter. It is apparent we have air because at that low pressure, using Boyle's law to breathe becomes impossible. (Science note: when you inhale, you create a lower pressure in your lungs and the higher pressure ambient air rushes in to fill the volume. You can do this on the surface where "gravity" is strongest no problem as gravity is helpless to keep gas from expanding to fill the volume. Because there is no equipment that can match fake space low pressure, your lungs are no match and would probably just invert under fake space conditions.)

Gotta have air there people. Air it is the linchpin of any model and unless you can be the very first to show gravity preventing gas from expanding to fill the volume, your lame ET stuff refers to lands beyond the ice wall.

Have a nice day!

Expand full comment

Robert, I too agree that the heliocentric model is only theoretical and not factual or observable. You might like this piece here:

https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/lies-not-discussed-within-the-truth

Expand full comment

The heliocentric model is totally impossible. It is the joke that never gets old and an idiot test to see if we are still sleeping enough to fall for the next made fro TV designed crisis.

Expand full comment

Both Science and Religion (Spirituality) have one thing in common - the pursuit of Truth. That is when the scientist and the spiritual practitioner are being honest with themselves and their pursuit. This very statement is made in the excellent movie Contact with Jodie Foster from 1997, of which the truth seeker Carl Sagen write the outline.

Expand full comment

I don’t understand why, learning more & more about the universe means we must abandon religious beliefs. To my knowledge religion doesn’t deny the existence of a huge & rapidly expanding universe about which the more we know the more questions there are. Neither does it insist that life cannot exist elsewhere. Perhaps I’m wrong but it seems that the more amazing discoveries science finds for us the more powerful becomes the evidence for a creator. I would love to hear other perspectives on this.

Expand full comment

Hey Suzanne -- I actually totally agree 100% with you! My theory is that what we are currently seeing is religious themes (mystic) being presented to as a observable "scientismic" (dogmatic pseudoscience). My argument is that this is presented to us to move us away from a spiritual perspective of reality, to a materialistic perspective -- devoid of a creator. This is hard to see at times because there's truth and lies mixed in all over the place.

These are the sort of topics I discuss, but I'm curious to get your thoughts on this article here: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/lies-not-discussed-within-the-truth

Expand full comment

It’s often valuable to have no opinion on some issues because of the impossibility of proof. When it comes to God, there is evidence all around us of the miracles of life but also, if one cultivates an interior life of contemplation, one can come to perceive His existence, not intellectually but through the heart - or maybe it is through the soul.

The spiritual dimension is where truth most often lies I feel. It seems counterintuitive to say that the physical realm can so easily be manipulated & presented as one thing while being another entirely, yet it does seem so to me. Look around at the world today & the myriad beliefs held by its inhabitants with very scanty evidence as to truth.

Truth is the thing, isn’t it? One would think that truth would be easy to find & yet it is difficult & elusive & even paradoxical when one would expect it to be straightforward & simple.

For me, I accept that many things can be true at once, even though they may appear to be incompatible with each other. I believe all things are possible & the only ‘truth’ I feel worth seeking with all my heart is what happens after death. All the world religions have their mystics & the testimony from them is always the same. There is a loving Creator who receives us with joy & a whole new & perfect existence awaits after our trials here on earth. One wonders why we prefer to engage in argument & conspiracy, rarely giving spirituality a real chance. We dismiss the experience of the saints & mystics as hysteria & turn to ‘the science’ as though that is infallible when science is, in fact, riven with falsehoods. We could learn a lot from the indigenous peoples of our world, whose close relationship with the planet has led to a way of life utterly in tune with the rhythms of nature, in contrast to our lives which have become shallow, materialistic & devoid of purpose (apart from the making of money).

Two things I wonder about. Firstly, why do we have such terrible leaders & why do we allow them such freedom to go about our world with a wrecking ball & secondly, maybe UFOs, starseeds, pleiedians & all things ‘outer space’ are our present & future worlds colliding.

Expand full comment

“We could learn a lot from the indigenous peoples of our world, whose close relationship with the planet has led to a way of life utterly in tune with the rhythms of nature, in contrast to our lives which have become shallow, materialistic & devoid of purpose”. 👍🏻👍🏻

Expand full comment